Five terms, numbered as clauses Arithmetic worked 2026
Terms of use, written as terms and priced like everything else here
A £10.00 credit under the forty times this domain works to is expected to close at minus £6.00. Where sixty times is applied instead, the identical credit closes at minus £14.00. The £8.00 between those two readings is what a term moving after a page was written is worth to somebody who trusted the page, and clause three is about exactly that.
Stated on the banner 4 terms What is published, what is not warranted, what the figures are, and what a reader undertakes. All four settled by reading this page. Stated, once you go and look £8.00 The cost of a multiple that has moved since a guide was written, which is why the date a guide carries matters more than its prose. Not stated before the money goes in 1 term, elsewhere Whether an operator’s current document still says what it said when it was read. Only that document settles it, and it is not this one.
1
What is published here
This domain publishes two things and nothing else. Arithmetic, performed on figures taken from published claims and published rules, with the working shown. And citations, pointing at whichever document, standard, licence condition or public register entry the arithmetic was performed against.
Guides sort each condition of an offer into one of six places and price what the sorting finds. Section pages group guides by the place that does the deciding. The publisher’s pages describe the body doing it, the method it follows, the money that pays for it, and the protections a reader may want. The method page is the one to read before relying on any total anywhere.
Offers written about here are run under licences issued outside Great Britain. Each guide states that and prices what it means for its own subject, so this clause does not repeat the pricing and does not substitute for it.
2
What is not warranted
Nothing published here is legal advice, financial advice, tax advice or gambling advice, and no page is a recommendation that anybody take an offer, open an account or send money anywhere. A page explaining that a condition is expected to cost £24.00 has made a statement about arithmetic, not a suggestion about conduct.
No term quoted or described here is warranted to be the term in force now. Bonus documents are rewritten by the parties who benefit from them, multiples move, windows shorten, ceilings appear, and none of that generates a notice to this publisher. A figure here is accurate as at the date the document behind it was read and makes no claim beyond that date.
No availability, continuity or completeness is promised either. A guide covers the conditions it names and makes no claim to have found every condition an operator may apply, since a condition at the sixth place is by definition one that nobody has published.
3
The figures are arithmetic, and they carry a date
Every number anywhere on this domain is computed. Not one is observed. Nothing here was arrived at by opening an account somewhere and watching what happened, and a sentence implying otherwise would be inaccurate as well as self-defeating on a domain whose subject is verification. The assumptions each sum spends are named in the sentence spending them.
Because the figures rest on documents, they rest on a date. Each guide prints the date the written terms behind it were read. Treat that date as part of the figure, in the way a currency sign is part of a price, because the cost of its being stale is calculable and is printed below.
Take a £10.00 credit . At the forty times this domain assumes, the coefficient comes to minus 0.6 and the credit is expected to finish at minus £6.00. The British regulator, explaining its decision to cap wagering requirements at ten times, recorded sixty times as a level some licensees were then applying. Put sixty through the same line, the coefficient falls to minus 1.4, and an identical credit finishes at minus £14.00.
£10.00 at the multiple a page was written against minus £6.00 The same £10.00 at a multiple of sixty instead minus £14.00 What a document rewritten after reading is worth £8.00
Eight pounds on a ten pound credit is why this clause is a term rather than an apology. A reader who takes a figure from here and does not open the current document in the written terms is carrying that gap themselves, and the gap grows with the size of the credit: the same movement on £50.00 is £40.00.
4
What a reader undertakes by using this
This domain is for adults. Nothing on it is directed at anybody under 18, no page here invites anybody under 18 to read it, and the material is written for people old enough to gamble lawfully in their own jurisdiction. The age check itself belongs to whoever is holding an account rather than to a publisher, and a British licence makes that check a precondition of play of every sort, incentive-funded play included.
Before committing anything, a reader is responsible for opening the operator’s own current terms and reading them. That is not a transfer of blame, it is the only step that settles the question, because an operator’s live document is the sole place where its own conditions are authoritative and a page here can at best report what that document said on a stated date.
A reader is responsible for their own compliance as well. Whether gambling at an operator licensed elsewhere is lawful or sensible for a particular person in a particular place depends on facts about that person, and this publisher knows none of them. Where a protection has been put in place, whether a blocking tool, a refused payment or a self-exclusion, no page here will help anybody past it and the page on staying in control carries the support routes instead.
5
These terms, run through the domain’s own sorter
A page about checkability that did not sort its own terms would be inconsistent with every other page here, so the five clauses divide as follows.
Settled by reading this page, at no cost and with no click: what is published, what is not warranted, that every figure is computed rather than observed, that nothing here is advice of any kind, and the age condition. Those are statements by this publisher about this publisher, and this page is the authoritative text for all of them. Nothing further needs to be reached.
Settled by going and looking, at the cost of opening one document: whether the sums reproduce. The four assumptions are named on the method page, the formula is one multiplication long, and a reader with a calculator can confirm or refute any total on the domain without asking this publisher’s permission or taking its word.
Not settled here at all, and the honest entry is unreachable: whether an operator’s document still reads as it read when it was read. Only that document answers, it is not published by this publisher, it carries no obligation to tell anybody it has changed, and no amount of care on this side closes that gap. What this clause can do is price it, which the block in clause three does. What it cannot do is remove it, and a terms page claiming otherwise would be the first uncheckable sentence on the domain.
One further item belongs in the same lane and is dealt with elsewhere rather than glossed here. The rate a given cashier hands over per converted reader goes unpublished by everyone involved, so it cannot be settled by reading this page or any other. The payment page states the arrangement, prices a conversion on its own stated assumptions, and says in terms that its own assurance is not a check.